Monday, June 24, 2013

OBAMA - His Frauds, Identity Theft, Birth Certificates, Stolen Social Security Number - a "British Whore"

Obama Threatens to Hold up Social Security Checks 

Let's look  at OBAMA's Background:

Birth Certificate:

Date: Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:18 AM
Subject: Fw: Well here it is! Copy of birth certificate..
To:


 


This should get people talking and emailing while the US Press will completely ignore it....
I sure hope this is true & can be verified, chances are all involved will end up like all the people that were called to testify against Clinton remember Vince Foster 2 bullets in the head with a revolver, It was ruled a suicide.
 
Don't know how accurate these documents are.  But they do raise some questions for those that have an open mind to this debate.  Take a look for yourselves.
 
 
 
 
Here it is, folks!  The document we have been waiting for!  Now if only SOMEONE in Congress or the Supreme Court will act on this!
Spread this around.....if these documents are as authentic as they certainly seem to be, Obama is NOT qualified to be our President and he sits in the White House illegally!
This is what Obama has spent almost $2M (so far) to hide.
cid:001d01cb9425$d0397b80$D5F69717@JillPC
Here's a close-up of the top of the document where you can plainly read his name and his parent's names, etc....
cid:001e01cb9425$d0397b80$D5F69717@JillPC
A British history buff was asked if he could find out who the colonial registrar was for Mombasa in 1961.  
After only a few minutes of research, he called back and said "Sir Edward F. Lavender” Note the same name near the bottom of the photo above.  
Source(s): “ Kenya Dominion Record 4667 Australian library."  
And here’s a close-up of the bottom of the document where you can read "Coast Providence of Kenya " and the  
official signature of the Deputy Registrar.....  
cid:001f01cb9425$d0397b80$D5F69717@JillPC
The above document is a "Certified Copy of Registration of Birth", but below is a copy of the actual Certificate of Birth... 
the real-deal legal kind of certificate.  
The Mombasa Registrar of Births has testified that Obama's birth certificate from Coast Province General Hospital in  
Mombasa is genuine. This copy was obtained by Lucas Smith through the help of a Kenyan Colonel who recently got it 
directly from the Coast General Hospital in Mombasa , Kenya .  Here  it is.....  
cid:002001cb9425$d0397b80$D5F69717@JillPC
Note the  footprint!!  
The local Muslim Imam in Mombasa named Barack with his Muslim middle name Hussein so his official name on this certificate is Barack Hussein Obama II.  
The grandmother of Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. reveals the story of his birth in Mombasa , Kenya , a seaport, after his mother suffered labor pains while swimming at ocean beach in Mombasa  
......  
"On August 4, 1961 Obama's mother, father and grandmother were attending a Muslim festival in Mombasa , Kenya .  
Mother had been refused entry to airplanes due to her nine month pregnancy.  It was a hot August day at the festival so the Obama’s went to the beach to cool off. While swimming in the ocean his mother  experienced labor pains so was rushed to the Coast  Provincial  
General Hospital, Mombasa, Kenya where Obama  was born a few hours later at 7:21 pm on August 4, 1961(what a sad day for the USA!).  Four days later his mother flew to Hawaii and registered his birth in Honolulu as a certificate of live birth which omitted the place and hospital of birth."   
Letter from Kitau in Mombasa , Kenya   ......
"I happen to be Kenyan. I was born 1 month before Obama at Mombasa medical center. I am a teacher here at the MM Shaw Primary School in Kenya . I compared my birth certificate to the one that has been put out by Taitz and mine is exactly the same. I even have the same registrar and format. The type is identical. I am by nature a skeptical person. I teach science here and challenge most things that cannot be proven. So I went to an official registrar today and pulled up the picture on the web. They magnified it and determined it to be authentic. There is even a plaque with Registrar Lavenders name on it as he was a Brit and was in charge of the Registrar office from 1959 until January of 1964. The reason the date on the certificate says republic of Kenya is that we were a republic when the "copy" of the original was ordered. I stress the word "copy". My copy also has republic of Kenya . So what you say is true about Kenya not being a republic at the time of Obama's
birth, however it was a republic when the copy was ordered.
The birth certificate is genuine. I assure you it will be authenticated by a forensic auditor. We are very proud Obama was born here. We have a shrine for him and there are many people who remember his birth here as he had a white mother. They are being interviewed now by one of your media outlets. 
Fortunately they even have pictures of his parents with him immediately after his birth at the Mombasa hospital with the hospital in the back ground.
It will be a proud day for us when it is proven that he was born here and a Kenyan became the most powerful man in the world.
I encourage anyone to come here and visit. I will be happy to take you and show you the pictures at the hospital myself as well as
my document and many others that are identical to what Taitz posted. God Bless.  Kitau"
So, how much more proof do we need?
Well, Here it is...{SJC}
WELL, HERE IT IS....
Lolo Soetoro, Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro, baby Maya Soetoro, and 9 year old Barry Soetoro.
  cid:part1.00020009.06070902@gmail.com
This registration document, made available on Jan. 24, 2007, by the Fransiskus Assisi
school inJakarta, Indonesia , shows the registration of Barack Obama under the name
Barry Soetoro made by his step-father, Lolo Soetoro.
Name: Barry Soetoro
Religion: Islam
Nationality: Indonesian
  cid:part2.08000607.02030903@gmail.com

  How did this little INDONESIAN Muslim child - Barry Soetoro, (A.K.A. Barack Obama)
get around the issue of nationality to become President of the  United States of America ?
PART 2:
In a move certain to fuel the debate over Obama's qualifications for the presidency, the
group "Americans for Freedom of Information" has released copies of President Obama's
college transcripts from  Occidental   College   ...
The transcript indicates that Obama, under the name Barry Soetoro, received financial aid as a
foreign student from  Indonesia  while an undergraduate at the school.  The transcript was released
by  Occidental   College  in compliance with a court order in a suit brought by the group in the
Superior Court of  California . The transcript shows that Obama (Soetoro) applied for financial
aid and was awarded a fellowship for foreign students from the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship program.
To qualify for this scholarship, a student must claim foreign citizenship.
This document provides the smoking gun that many of Obama's detractors have been seeking -
that he is NOT a natural-born citizen of the  United States  - necessary to be President of these
United States.  Along with the evidence that he was first born in  Kenya , here we see that there is
no record of him ever applying for  US  citizenship..
Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation has released the results of their investigation
of Obama's campaign spending.  This study estimates that Obama has spent upwards of $950,000
in campaign funds in the past year with eleven law firms in 12 states for legal resources to block
disclosure of any of his personal records.
Mr. Kreep indicated that the investigation is still on-going but that the final report will be provided
to the  U.S.  attorney general, Eric Holder.  Mr. Holder has refused comment on this matter.
LET OTHER FOLKS KNOW THIS NEWS - THE MEDIA WON'T! 
 



Social Security Number:

Subject: Fwd: SSN from Researcher Mike
To: 



Facts regarding a SSN.  Everyone's first three digits represent the
state where the application was submitted.  Matter of fact known and used
by the military and civil service personnel when doing background checks
regarding  applications.

  
THIS IS WAY MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE "BOGUS BIRTH CERTIFICATE"  THE
MAN IS A COMPLETE FRAUD.  SPREAD THE WORD!!  AND GET OUT THE VOTE!!

 
The Plot Thickens
 
An intensive investigation has revealed the identity of the man whose Social
Security number (SSN) is being used by President Obama:   Jean Paul Ludwig,
who was born in France in 1890, emigrated to the United States in 1924, and
was assigned SSN 042-68-4425 (Obama's current SSN) in or about March 1977.
 
Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut..  Because of that, his
SSN begins with the digits 042, which are among only a select few reserved
for Connecticut residents.
 
Obama never lived or worked in that state!  Therefore, there is no reason on
earth for his SSN to start with the digits 042.  None whatsoever!
 
Now comes the best part!  Ludwig spent the final months of his life in
Hawaii, where he died.
 
Conveniently, Obama's grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, worked part-time in
the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse, and therefore had
access to the SSNs of deceased individuals.
 
The Social Security Administration was never informed of Ludwig'sdeath, and
because he never received Social Security benefits there were no benefits to
stop and therefore, no questions were ever raised.
 
The suspicion, of course, is that Dunham, knowing her grandson was not a
U.S. citizen, either because he was born in Kenya or became a citizen of
Indonesia upon his adoption by Lolo Soetoro simply scoured the probate
records until she found someone who died who was not receiving Social
Security benefits, and selected Mr. Ludwig's Connecticut SSN for Obama.
 
Just wait until Trump gets past the birth certificate and onto the issue
of Barry O's use of a stolen SSN. You will see leftist heads exploding,
because they will have no way of defending Obama.
 
Although many Americans do not understand the meaning of the term "natural
born" there are few who do not understand that if you are using someone
else's SSN it is a clear indication of fraud.
 
Let's all start getting the word out to everybody on our mailing lists.
********************************************************
articles posted previously:

Aloha kakou,

Will the real Osama Bin Laden please stand-up? May be we should be asking, will the real Obamaplease stand-up?

Almost two weeks has past of the end of Public Enemy Number One, Osama Bin Laden yet there is still speculation. But has Osama Bin Laden become a fictional character Strawman of convenience or is he
a National Hero? Some question, is Osama Death Certificate as valid as Obama's Birth Certificate?

After all the "At a Boy, Obama , and the Monday morning media quarterbacks substitution for CoachObama, finally the chaotic world can rest in peace, for the kepalo, Satan is dead? Even "24" Jack
Bauer could not have done a better job of such a "diplomatic assassination". After billions of taxpayers dollars, destruction of sovereign foreign nations with their millions of refugees the USA gets
its Enemy. We get our Man! May I share my view of some of the hypocrisy of events of that week of infamy.

May 1 Situation Room (May Day is Might Day)

The scene of Obama's Executive Staff at the Situation Nintendo Room playing Geronimo on May 1 was almost as convincing as landing on the moon with the American Flag waving in the windless atmosphere
of earth's luna surface. Then, producing the stash of evidence that included a video of the AK-47 totting Osama playing Nintendo games like that of Obama's Staff of Intelligence playing Geronimo, of
materials for a ten year run of ABC's Television 24.

There are several reports that indicate Osama Bin Laden died several years ago from wounds her suffered in various attacks. But, nothing like having an "Enemy of Convenience" ready to be blamed and
not able to defend the charges against you as the Perpetrator of Peace. Some say Osama was spiritually kept alive so the the escalation of aggression in the Middle East will continue until India
becomes the commercial power to check or cancel the commercial trade power of China for no right-minded military power would ever consider attacking China. Is Osama Bin Laden just a fictional
corporate Strawman created for commercial purposes just like U. S. Citizens? Or is Osama Bin Laden a National Hero of Afghanistan like Sadam of Iraq or Quadafy of Libya, and soon Osama maybe the Hero
of the Arab World. But they all have one thing in common for they got their start as CIA Operatives in their homeland.

(Note:  Osama Bin Ladin in one of his messages said that the Western bankers would be brought down.  He blamed them for the problems of the Middle East.  Did find out that the Middle East Oil men
were told to bank only with certain banks, the investments were documented on bonds...........and after so long, the bonds could be transferred into money......well, that certain agreed upon bank
transferred the wealth to other banks, then closed down........leaving the Middle East oil men with worthless bonds. )

Americans were cheering in the streets, kissing strangers just like V-Day after WWII, as joyfully like most German people did approving Hitler's invasion of Poland in 1939. How is it that stronger
military nations start their aggression only against weaker nations?

I haven't heard so much "engineering consent" since Pearl Harbor but then I was just 5 years old. For the first week after December 7, we lived a a home-made bomb shelter dug-out of coconut tree logs
that we shared with about 10,000 toads and mosquitoes in Kailua, Oahu, for all Hawaii were indoctrinated that the "Japs" were returning in a week with a landing force to take over the Hawaiian
Islands , and those of us who survived would be Japanese slaves. Very soon we became more hungry than scared and came out to eat without chewing mosquitoes and toads at your feet.

U. S. Federally trusted Caucasian Civil Defense Wardens enforced Martial Law with Military backup close bye. Blackout cause all windows in structures and auto headlights to be painted black and no
outside barbeques at night but it was a lot better than mosquitoes and toads as companions.

May 2 World Trade Center Ground Zero

Obama and Company attend ceremony of WTC meeting with Emergency personal survivors and surviving families. The only thing missing was Osama Bin Laden's head on a silver platter.
Professional documents show the absolute destruction of Tower I and II was impossible to happen to a Class I Protected Structural Steel High-rise Superstructure. An authorites ry to tell the public
that Building 7 fell due to harmonic shock it felt from Tower I and II.. No bodies of passengers on the three hijacked planes nor aircraft parts were found or detected. All ground zero evidences was
fastly secured away from the site and disposed of in the depths somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean, never to be investigated by any authority or examined under forensic laboratory analysis. Property and
Casualty Insurance layered companies said nothing Very similar destruction of evidence of Osama's assassination, were the victim Osama is the evidence but all for the good of the World.

(Note:  the 911 Twin Towers were owned by the Rockefellers.  Part of the buildings were open and not rented out, which means loss of revenue, inability to pay for the tremendous amounts of mortgage
for the area.  The buildings were insured.  The buildings surrounding the site were mostly vacant and up for sale.

The Rockefellers were the pemanent heads of the Standard Oil Company which evolved into EXXON, and operates as the umbrella organization over many other organizations, companies including many of the
smaller oil companies, banks, etc.  examples are the GW Bush oil companies, Cheney's oil company, and Candoleeza Rice, one of the heads at the EXXON Oil who even had an oil ship/tanker named after
her before she went into office.

The Rockefellers gave the land which has the United Nations building ......the United Nations was put together by the U.S., England, and the bankers (Morgan, Bank of England, etc.) who created the
CFR/Council on Foreign Relations.  The United Nations departed from the Law of Nations (Queen Liliuokalani said that the U.S. breached the Law of Nations) and was formed with the intention of being
the basis of the One World government/New World Order.

War was set up for the Middle East since the 1970's for their oil.

Criminal set up for the Middle East is on record.



The 911 destruction was planned ......................a friend's girlfriend was in a meeting on that day when her boss answered a ringing phone and said "yes, here they come now".....as all of them
watched a plane flying straight into the building across the way...........her boss turned to the office workers and instructed them to leave the building...........and there are many other
documented stories.....   ).


May 5 White House Fiesta Cinco de Mayo Celebration

Hundreds of Special Latino, Hispanic and Chicano Guest were invited to the Fiesta de White House with Barry and Michele honoring Mexican Independence.  Mexican Independence? Almost as equal to the
Emancipation of African Slaves! Since 1800 Mexico has had nearly 40 years of war that has bankrupted the Country and is land base 1/3 reduced.

1810 Mexican Independence War with Spain. Eleven years later (1821) Spain finally leave Mexico.
1836 to 1845 The Republic of Texas is formed within the territory of of Mexico. Battle of the Alamo sets the stage for the American -Mexican War. The USA to stir the plot claims The Republic of Texas
as its 28th State in 1846.

(Note:  It was the sugar planters from the Hawaiian Islands who moved over to Mexico to grab large tracts of lands for their plantations.  These sugar planters then obtained the support of the
American Calvary to support their criminal claims affecting the Mexicans.  Linda Lingle, who hails from Texas are cousins of the car dealers, the dethronement of Queen Liliuokalani activists, et.
als.  I have a very old history book dated in the early 1900's with this information about the sugar planters from Hawaii.)

1846 to 1848 U.S. Army and Naval forces invade Mexico. Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo awards the United States of America 1.3 million million acres which soon become the new states of Arizona,
California, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, and Wyommy and of course Texas. Prior to this, Missouri was considered the Far Western State of the United States of America!. CINCO DE MAYO, MEXICAN
INDEPENDENCE! Americans celebrate the defeat of Mexico and Latino's and Chicanos play music and dance to their demise just Hawaiians do on dates of their demise.

1858 to 1861 Mexican Civil War
1861 to 1867 French Mexican War. France occupies coast of Mexico disguised as support for the Confederate States in the American Civil War and stays in Mexico until it is defeated by Mexico in 1867.

(Note:  The French helped to fund the Confederates in American Civil War supporting Slavery with the U.S. and England.  The U.S. and England supported both sides.  Both U.S. and England borrowed
money from the Bank of England for War.  The French were only interested in maintaining Slaves.  In the 1822 Secret Treaty of Verona, the move towards One World Order/ New World Order was the move
made by Austria, France, Prussia, Russia, the U.S., England and the Vatican, who was complemented for maintaining "Obedience" amongst the people.  See the Secret Treaty of Verona at

  1.
     Treaty of Verona - Secret Articles

     Senator Owen: I wish to put in the Record the secret treaty of Verona of November 22, 1822, showing what this ancient conflict is between the rule of the ...
     http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/verona.htm" target='_blank'>www.biblebelievers.org.au/verona.htm
- Cached - Similar
     ►
  2.
     The Evening Light - The Secret Treaty of Verona.

     The Secret Treaty of Verona referred to its contractors as the "Holy Alliance". ... of Congress as to what the meaning of this Secret Treaty truly was. ...
     http://www.eveninglight.org.nz/secrettreatyofverona.html" target='_blank'>www.eveninglight.org.nz/secrettreatyofverona.html - Similar
  3.
     1916 - Congress Record - Sen. Owen Treaty of Verona

     5 min - Jan 16, 2009 - Uploaded by ForgottenHistoryUSA
     books.google.com Because I can find no official online primary source for the 1916 Congressional Record, I have linked to a copy of "Where is ...
     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_UBXHSFr4bw" target='_blank'>www.youtube.com/watch?v=_UBXHSFr4bw
     More videos for secret treaty of verona »



1910 -1912 Mexican Civil War. In between these years there have been years of Mexican-Indian Wars.
Verily, verily,  Cinco de Mayo can not be Mexican Independence. It is "Sicko de Mind-o"

Certainly, a great week in Hypocrisy! And we make it possible!
Throughout history, our ignorance condones and perpetuate our stupidity. In 1918, U. S. Senator Hiram Johnson said, "the real casualty of war is Truth!

malama ke kino,
pilipo

Hawaiian National (1936)


(references:

******************************
********************************
9-11 Truth Movement

I don't think there is a more important topic than this. IF our government is in any way complicit in the 9-11 tragedy, we must fight to expose it.



pent.jpg picture by MrSammo1

The Big Lie is a propaganda technique. It was defined by Adolf Hitler in his 1925 autobiography Mein Kampf as a lie so "colossal" that no one would believe that someone "could have the impudence to
distort the truth so infamously".




















discussion

































**********************************************





tail-line.jpg


Report of bin Laden’s death spurs questions from conspiracy theorists
May 2, 2011, Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com" target='_blank'>http://www.washingtonpost.com
/ lifestyle/style/report-of-bin- laden...

While much of America celebrated the dramatic killing of Osama bin Laden, the Sept. 11 conspiracy theorists still had questions. For them and a growing number of skeptics, the plot only thickened.
Could the public trust bin Laden’s DNA samples? Why was [his body disposed of] in an undisclosed location in the northern Arabian Sea? “This has not put a single of the 9/11 questions to bed,” said
Steven Jones, a retired Brigham Young University physics professor and contributor to the 9/11 Truth Movement. “I don’t know how you can have closure, when there are hundreds of contradictions to the
stories that you were told. The story doesn’t end here because we are told bin Laden is dead,” said Mike Berger, who works with 911Truth.org, an organization founded to examine facts around the
attack. Alex Jones, a radio personality out of Austin, who gives voice to the 9/11 Truth Movement and runs the Web site Infowars.com, sent out a Web headline, “Red Alert. Inside Sources: Bin Laden
Corpse Has Been on Ice for Nearly a Decade.” He lists FBI officials and counterintelligence leaders from Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan who have said for years that bin Laden was dead. Former Council
on Foreign Relations member Steve R. Pieczenik even told Jones on the air in 2002 that bin Laden had been dead for months.

Note: For intriguing BBC News reports from 2010 and 2007 which claim bin Laden was already dead at that time, click here and here. WantToKnow team member David Ray Griffin's book establishing the
likelihood that Osama bin Laden died in December 2001, Osama bin Laden: Dead or Alive?, is available here.



Osama Bin Laden never charged for 9/11
May 2, 2011, International Business Times
http://www.ibtimes.com" target='_blank'>http://www.ibtimes.com/ articles/140099/20110502/ osama-bin-laden-n...

Osama Bin Laden's death is being celebrated, and everyone seems to repeat the old conspiracy theory that he was indeed the mastermind behind the terror attacks of 9/11. But that was never proven, and
there is not even evidence hinting at such a connection according to the FBI. Osama Bin Laden was never formally charged, because the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation didn't deliver the necessary
evidence to the Department of Justice. Read ... what Rex Tomb, FBI Director of Investigative Publicity, stated in 2006 about the FBI's position: “The FBI gathers evidence. Once evidence is gathered,

DEATH BY OBAMA "The British Whore" ---Homeless, Healthcare ---Reasons to Impeach, Remove, etc.

"Get the Judas Out" - Lyndon LaRouche ..........the BRUTISH Empire/British Empire explained, etc.:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCQUXypspl0
Latest on Lyndon LaRouche--------"impeaching of OBAMA"; ........collapse of the World economy coming up.....
"get rid of OBAMA now"..........collapse scheduled late July,
August...not a depression, money ceases to exist....
"BARACK OBAMA is their(England's) stooge".......Constitution
remains.....
:
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCQUXypspl0
















































ux-thumb-128" id="video-thumb-_btVhyFtN5c-6194597""> Weekly Report - July 21st, 2010"">
1:07:16
|
1
month ago
|
1,523
views





aloha.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGKx2LNbF5M
Tags:
Share Twitter Facebook

Replies to This Discussion

Amelia GoraPermalink Reply by Amelia Gora on August 28, 2010 at 9:02am
transcripts available at the LaRouche website:

http://www.larouchepub.com/

latest:


This interview appears in the August 27, 2010 issue of Executive Intelligence Review.
The Game Is Over: He's Out;
The `Indian Sign' Is on Obama

Lyndon LaRouche was the special guest on the LPAC-TV Weekly Report Aug. 18, hosted by John Hoefle, and joined by EIR Counterintelligence Editor Jeffrey Steinberg.

[PDF version of this interview]

John Hoefle: So, Lyn, what do you have on the agenda, today?

Lyndon LaRouche: We have a situation, in which the dumping of this President is clearly in process. The dumping is not secure, either in general fact, or in timing. But, the word has been out since the middle of this past week: "The Indian sign is up. He's out." When, and how, is still to be decided.

One of the factors in this, is that, as of the middle of last week, a phase-shift occurred, partly by virtue of the policy of the current Administration, or at least people like [Treasury Secretary Tim] Geithner and so forth, who have set into motion, a hyperinflationary program, comparable to what was done in Germany, before the Nazis, in the famous hyperinflation of 1923. Now, what was done in Germany is notable, and the comparison is extremely important for people to understand today. At that point, Germany was targetted for this operation, this rape operation, within its own borders. And a French occupation of the Rhineland aggravated the problem acutely. So this started a hyperinflationary explosion in Germany, from the Spring into the October-November period, the most famous hyperinflation in modern history.

We face a similar situation now, and I say "similar," because the difference is, in the case of 1923 Germany, the hyperinflation was confined to one country. It was actually within the borders of that country, and it was by an occupying, military power, the Anglo-French power. Today, the hyperinflation is global.

And one other feature: It can not be compared with the hyperinflationary crisis in Japan [in the late 1980s]. Because, then, Japan was not an international economy. In other words, the point is, a hyperinflation of this type can only occur within the bounds of the political grounds of an economy, because money is a political entity; it is not a measure of value as such, it's a political entity. And it's whatever the territorial area is, of that political unit, is affected. All right, so, Japan is Japan: Japan is, politically, Japan. So that Japan hyperinflation arising from the carry trade, was not a global factor. It affected the planetary system, but it was not a global factor.

Today, we have a global factor of hyperinflation. We are in a hyperinflationary mode, comparable to what struck Germany in the Spring and Summer of 1923. However, this time, it's on a global scale, and it's not the tight effect that you would have in a Weimar Germany. But, it is comparable to the German hyperinflation, otherwise. But it's on a global scale, because the global scale is defined, as you know.

Since 1971-72, the United States' dollar has been subject to the British Empire. That is, when we lifted the fixed-exchange-rate system, under conditions created by the Vietnam War on the U.S. economy—under these conditions, and with the launching, by Lord Jacob Rothschild, of the Inter-Alpha Group, what happened, is that the United States economy became implicitly a subject of this new group, which now represents over 70% of the world's monetary activity, including hyperinflationary stuff.

So therefore, the hyperinflation is occurring inside the Anglo-American area, with emphasis on Anglo, because of the Inter-Alpha Group, because more than 70%, of the world financial markets are controlled by this one area, and the hyperinflation is now occurring, especially in that area. It spills off into other parts of the world as a whole, but the primary locus of the hyperinflation is the Anglo-American sector, that is, Wall Street, as, actually, a British colonial power occupying the United States, essentially.

So that has to be understood. So don't expect something exactly like Germany, before the Nazis, which led to the Nazis, of course; but expect this kind of adjustment.

But as of now, the United States is in a hyperinflationary mode, under the policies of Geithner, and Geithner's associates. So, what happened, in two days during this past week, you had the impact of the fact that the United States was going into a hyperinflationary commitment, under Geithner, under Geithner's direction, which means the present Administration's direction. So, at that point, you had mass speculation, in two days of last week, which is a tip-off of that change. Then, you get, on the weekend, as typified by what came out of the British press, on Monday [Aug. 15], is, you now get a reaction declaring, "The game is over." The hyperinflationary mode has struck; doom is inevitable, and get ready.

In this context, suddenly, the oars are out, for the great ship to go down the ocean of hyperinflation—unless we change it.
A Short-Term Interval

Therefore, we now have a very short-term interval available to us, I would say, in the coming months, the two months, three months from now. And then, the game would be over. So, what we have now, is, we have about a 30-day period, in which the President, at least as planned now, is going to be out of the game. He is going to be on Martha's Vineyard, and who knows where else? Raising grapes, or rapes, or whatever he does. And so, the sign is out: The game is over, hyperinflation is here. People are running scared on the money markets, knowing that the hyperinflation is here. And Obama is probably being trajectoried out.

Now, how that's going to work is not certain. I have various stories as to how this might work out; different people have different views on the matter. But the fact is, if we don't get rid of Obama from the Presidency, now, within the 30 days, or 60 days at most, before us, that is, well before the November elections, if we don't get Obama out, we have lost the United States, and the world goes into a hyperinflationary explosion.

That is the choice. Obama will not change. Obama is a mental case, of a special kind, and he will not change. He's like the Emperor Nero, and he's like Adolf Hitler: They will go down to the end, until somebody removes them. And somebody has to remove this guy. Now, the question is: How are we going to get him removed? We can not allow to have him killed; he has to be protected. But, the game is over. And anyone who thinks that politics-as-usual is available to them—they are nuts.

There has to be a radical change. There has to be, essentially, a sudden, very sudden change. And the change is, again, to repeat, for those who don't know: The first thing to do, is—Obama out. You can not do anything, until you've got Obama out. You can set into place, things which we will do, when Obama is out. But you can't do a thing: This guy is what he is. He will cling to his position. He will not change his policy, willfully, unless somebody puts a drug into him and hypnotizes him, or something like that, and gets him to say things he would never say willingly, otherwise.

Jeff Steinberg: Hijack his teleprompter.

LaRouche: That wouldn't work any more. The teleprompter is also brainwashed.

So, that's the issue, right now. And there are several things that can be done, to do this:

The first thing, which has already occurred. First, you have the explicit actions, which were signaled from Britain, and other places, but essentially from Britain, that the game is over. And, at the same time, a signal from Wall Street, and from the European markets, especially the British markets: The hyperinflationary phase has been entered. And you had two days last week, where you got this wild speculation, which is a reflection of knowledge. Then you got the Monday breakout in the British press and elsewhere, indicating that the hyperinflationary breakdown is on.

So, that's where we stand. Anybody who thinks there is something different than that, is being very foolish. And we see also, the fact that Obama has suddenly been inspired to join the former governor of the state of Illinois [Rod Blagojevich], and to join him in, shall we say, a quasi-retirement, for a period of time, until a more decisive disposition has been adopted, that is, to get him out, one way or the other. So, that's where we are.
Obama Out, Glass-Steagall, NAWAPA

Now, the sequence that has to be taken, is of course, of the utmost importance: The first thing that has to be accomplished, is, Obama out of the Presidency. At least, de facto, out of the Presidency, where he no longer controls policy in any degree. And Geithner, of course, his "little boy," is going to have to find new toys to play with.

But then, the first thing we have to do, is re-install Glass-Steagall, exactly as Roosevelt defined it in 1933, an exact copy of 1933. That means that the entire banking system, the merchant banking system and similar things, go under Federal protection. Because, by cancelling the entire speculative market, which is what happens when you apply Glass-Steagall, the banks that remain, under Federal protection, are not solvent. They have to be given government protection, so they are not put into insolvency, until we can straighten the mess out. Because they don't have the assets to cover their deficits, even that portion. So therefore, they have to go into Federal protection.

And it would have been a lot easier, if the idiots had not interfered with my Homeowners and Bank Protection Act in 2007. We could have avoided all this nonsense. But they did it, and it was Barney Frank and company who led the charge on that. So, it's their fault. If it's a problem, go tell Barney Frank that his services are no longer wanted, and he will cry, or he will do something like that.

So therefore, we have to put them under protection, the whole banking system, the Federal system.

We then, knowing that the Federal government is now suddenly relieved, from the implications of the funny-money system—in other words, all this funny-money stuff, financial derivatives and so forth, is simply cancelled. The nation takes no responsibility, for paying any debts of this nature. They are gambling debts: "Ya lost, buddy! It's a gambling debt. We don't cover gambling debts! We cover legal, proper obligations, conforming to our Constitutional standard."

Therefore, since the government would then be freed of these gambling debts, which are being enforced by Geithner and company, we then are able to issue Federal credit from the U.S. government. This credit would largely go into supplying credit for the use of national banking; that is, for the commercial banking system, and national banking institutions. This money, which is put in there, which will show a throughput of credit, which will put the banks, at least, formally, under law, into stable operations. They will not be treated as bankrupt. They will be treated under reorganization, so they will have a mass of money, all of the decent, Federal types of banks, Federal and state, which have conformed to Glass-Steagall.

That money will then have to be focussed on a number of things, but one thing that has to be done, absolutely: We must put through—which we are now working on, and we will have in the coming two weeks—we will have more and more public information uttered by us on this, on the actual design, for an installation of a NAWAPA program.[1]

Now, this will mean that we will be employing—within a very short period of time, once Obama is out—we will be employing, under this provision, millions of skilled people, either scientists, or related categories, or highly skilled trades. And we will probably be employing, in the NAWAPA project, very rapidly, about 3 or 4 million people. That is our first estimate. When you take the total territory, this is, in some sense comparable to what Franklin Roosevelt did quite successfully, in 1933, with the Tennessee Valley Authority. This is a much bigger operation, and it will have a great global effect, and it will have reverberations throughout the world.

This means, that we will be taking this area, and we will be changing the rainfall patterns, inside the United States, because this project, once installed—and it will be a process of installation and development—in the meantime, will probably employ about 3 million people, directly, as productive elements of this process.

And we have the people there, ready to be hired. All we have to do, is get some laws through to make sure this thing works; but once we have done that little technical job, we have 3 million highly skilled people, not people doing imitation work jobs, paper clip jobs, but people who are really skilled, highly productive, and we will have about 3 million of them employed; employed on the basis of the utterance of Federal credit, under a Federal law, which generates the basis for that credit.

Now, the banking system, the merchant banking system, will now go into functioning, and the biggest stimulus will be this. And you are talking about a 30- to 50-year-term investment.

Now, you could take the rate of employment which has occurred, the actual unemployment—what they do now, is they shoot people who run out of their 99th week of [unemployment benefits].

Steinberg: "99 and out."

LaRouche: Yeah, 99, out, and dead. 99 and dead.
Reversing the Depression

Suddenly, we stop that nonsense: We count the labor force as the labor force, not those whom the Federal government, by some cheating scheme, chooses to recognize as the labor force. People who actually would like to have jobs, would like to have decent employment! They are the labor force! If they are willing and able to work, they are the labor force.

Now, you take the couple million jobs which have been lost, largely due to Bush and Obama, and you are going to put a 3-million-job employment of the highest skills, and the rates of pay that these people command, just for the normal work that they do, you have suddenly reversed the depression, within a matter of weeks. And that is what it takes. We not only need a reform of our system, we need some action that corresponds to the implementation of that reform.

Now, what would happen then? Once we do that, we have a situation, with Russia and some other countries, which have similar projects in mind.

And the other aspect of this, is the water problem: Since Teddy Roosevelt was President, we have destroyed the development of the United States territory. In other words, the territory from the 20-inch-rainfall line in the Western states (Figure 1), to the mountain ranges on the coast of the Pacific—that whole area has never been developed in any honest way. It is still a desert land. We have been draining the water from the aquifers, underneath the prairie land, and we are now sinking the land level, by taking the water out! And we are exhausting the water resources, to maintain our agricultural system!

Now, not only by putting this system in, will we stop that, we will stop draining—which is a crucial problem—our underground water resources. We will then be generating, as the program works—and we are talking about decades—we will be increasing the amount of evaporation, caused by the throughput of water, through trees and leafy shrubbery, and so forth. You are now suddenly changing the character of this whole area, which is a desert area. Rapidly, this desert area is going to become a richly developed area. And you have a factor of 2.7 times—the moisture that you run through the NAWAPA project, will give you 2.7 times the moisture falling on the territory of the United States as a whole—and Canada, they both benefit—and to a lesser degree, a part of Mexico.

So you are creating—for every drop of water that you conserve through NAWAPA, you are getting the equivalent of 2.7 drops of water, in the rainfall patterns going from west to east, across the United States territory. Whereas now, you are changing the character, by going to green! And that means you have to rip up and destroy the solar collectors, which are a waste of money, and they are ecologically stupid. Because every territory you tear up to put in solar collectors out there, you are destroying the fertility of the land-area. So, the first thing you have to do, for conservation purposes, you have to rip up the solar collectors, which are the greatest threat to agriculture ever invented. It's insane! ...

So, in this case, we are going to, essentially, we are going to a real green policy! And the green policy, is taking the desert and making it bloom. That means, on the mountains where conservation is developing forest areas, in areas which are maintaining the water system; wheat is a mistake in a sense. We need wheat grain, but wheat is a mistake, because from an ecological standpoint, we want leafy vegetables. Wheat is very inefficient in vapor transmission, and we need vapor transmission, now. That means we want, essentially, trees, shrubbery—we want grasses, of course; we want wheat of course, but the emphasis, from an ecological standpoint, has to be on trees and leafy vegetables.

Which means a highly diversified agriculture. What we have done with agriculture in the Western Plains is idiotic. The whole thing of just cutting down the hedgerows, and growing wheat all over the place, according to the "Monsanto law," which has now taken over and subordinated the supreme law of the nation. We have to go back to hedgerows, to a traditional agricultural system, in the sense of—large-scale, yes; high-technology, yes, but we want green: We want leafy vegetables, we want trees and hedgerows, we want all the things that go with a good system of taking the moisture, which we are saving from just flooding directly into the Pacific and into the Arctic Ocean, we are taking that moisture, we are putting it in this system, and we are organizing it, so you don't have dry spells. You've got a buffer: You are taking the average amount of water you are going to get through the entire system, you are conserving it; you are putting it through an area where you are growing trees, you are growing other things. You are developing the green, and developing the green in this area, which is one of the largest areas in the world for development: And that water that is going through there, 2.7 times the amount will come down as rainfall on the whole territory of the United States.

So that's our perspective.

And we also, of course, are going into space. Now, people may not understand what space is, and this President certainly does not understand space. He has got a lot of space in his head someplace, but I don't think there's anything there, otherwise, just empty space, not for rent. But that's where we stand.

That's what our perspective is, right now.

So therefore, number one: Obama out. You want to save the United States? Obama out! If you do not get Obama out, you don't give a damn about the United States. It has to happen. Because the man is a madman. He will not change, he will not adjust. He really is a Nazi, in terms of his policies, his health-care policies, these other things—just like Hitlerian policies. So, that has to end.
Large-Scale Infrastructure To Develop the World

Now, we have to have Glass-Steagall: We have to now integrate other countries, which will be our partners in this deal, and that includes Europe, it includes a program for Africa, and without large-scale infrastructure in Africa, you are not going to do anything good for Africa. And that is an obvious problem. The whole continent's a mess, because of this problem, mismanagement—largely British. The British actually run Africa. If you find something bad in Africa, blame the British, they are to blame, the British Empire.

We have large-scale projects in Russia, available, in the Vernadsky Institute. But, what is required is, the whole of Siberia, the northern area, contains very large mineral deposits. These mineral deposits are indispensable, for countries to the south of that, including China, India, and so forth, which have poorer mineral deposits in their land area. Remember, that India has 1.1 billion people, China 1.5 billion people, in a congestion, which is about three, four times our land area. They have very limited resources there. They are developing an infrastructure, but it's not developed yet, it's not reaching enough of the whole population. So therefore, we have to have a development period, in which international credit is focussed, to ensure that countries like India, and especially China, are able to move up.

And we are going to have to develop water systems, we're going to have to develop mineral systems, and a lot of this is going to require the development of this large territory which was once part of the Soviet Union, of the Asian part of the Soviet Union. And that territory is going to have to be developed, for mineral resources and similar kinds of things, which will then flow down, to sustain the southern part of the Asian area

This will mean we are setting up an international system. Because, with a Bering Strait project, and with the development from Europe into Africa, we can launch an infrastructure development program with these areas, which will solve the problem there. It's a long-term project. But, without infrastructure, of the type that nobody allows in Africa today—and any country in Africa that tries to develop and infrastructure project now, such as Sudan, is going to be crushed, by the British!

The British do not allow development; the British are the greatest genocidalists in the world. They do not allow any development of any significance in Africa. Any country in Africa, that is actually developing independently, which is not raping its own people, that they can get by with—they will destroy the country! They will overthrow the government—as the British are planning to overthrow the government of Sudan! It's a typical case of genocide, done by the British. And that comes to an end.

So, we can have a plan for an immediate development of the world economy over the coming century, based on using the NAWAPA program, as a fulcrum to coordinate with developments in Asia, to coordinate to develop the Americas. We have this Darien Strait problem, but with that, getting the transportation system through there into South America, means that South America, which is an impossible problem in many respects now, can be developed.

So we can develop the Americas, we can develop Eurasia, we can develop Africa, which is the greatest part of the land-mass area of the world. And this can be a program, which is a key cornerstone for us, over the coming remainder of this century. It means three generations of our people are going to go through an upgrade in transformation.

In the meantime, we start, as I proposed, and include not only a Glass-Steagall standard of credit, but also a fixed-exchange-rate system: Then we have a system, a global system of sovereign nation-states, in cooperation, using large-scale projects in infrastructure, to further this. And we can say, the remainder of this century can be secure, as a century of progress for mankind. Whereas, under Obama, if we were to continue Obama as President, exactly the opposite effect is inevitable: a dark age.
The Real History of Mankind

Hoefle: Well, what the Obama Administration is doing, with Geithner and Bernanke, they are basically printing money like mad, to try to save the Inter-Alpha system.

LaRouche: It appears that way; but that is not the motive. People do not know history. They may know history in a sense of a schoolbook sense, or in a sense of a political history, but they don't know the real history of mankind. It's not discussed. There is too much of this green philosophy of the other type available.

The objective of empire—and we are talking about maritime empire, which started actually in the Mediterranean, in the aftermath of the fall of the Persian Empire, in which you had a maritime power develop imperial power. First, it was in the Mediterranean, and then there was a shift, which is what the British system means, a shift to the Atlantic. So, from 1492 on, especially from the beginning of the 17th Century, there was a shift in power, of imperial power, from the Mediterranean-centered imperial power, into the Atlantic-centered imperial power, and the absorption of the Pacific area into the Atlantic area. This was the shift, which moved the capital of international imperial finance from Venice, as such, into a Venetian colony, called London.

London, the British system of imperialism, is not something specific to the United Kingdom. The people of the United Kingdom and Ireland, are a completely different thing than this empire. The empire is essentially located in a Venetian-style financial power, centered on London.

But London—it's really a Venetian system, in which Venice, from 1000 A.D. on, was the center of power, of the Mediterranean imperial system. With the development of the maritime traffic in the Atlantic Ocean, and the exposure into the Indian Ocean and the Pacific, maritime power was now shifted to the Atlantic region, and therefore, there was the movement from the continental political capital for imperialism, to London. And London is simply the residence, across the English Channel, which is the dividing line, which controls the world. That is, about 70% of the world's banking is controlled by the Rothschild and similar groups. But you have to recognize that Wall Street and U.S. banking, is also controlled by the British, as you can see, in the way this thing functions now.

So, that is where the problem lies. The imperialism is, if you want to have an empire, in which you have a ruling class, which rules the world, perpetually, you have to keep people stupid. Because only stupid people would put up with that! So, therefore, what you need to do, is, you plan to reduce the level of technology—that's what the green movement is! Keep people stupid! And then they are not a threat to the empire. This is the thesis of Aeschylus' trilogy, the Prometheus trilogy: That they want to keep people stupid. Don't allow them to know anything; don't allow them to know science and technology. Keep them stupid, and then you can manage them for the empire.

And the objective now, as you see in the case of England, in terms of the policies of Prince Philip: the policy of eliminating technology, eliminating progress, and making people stupid. But if you make people stupid, they are less productive. So therefore, Prince Philip and his friend, the former Nazi SS man Prince Bernhard, came up with this program, of the World Wildlife Fund. And the purpose of the World Wildlife Fund, which is the same thing as Bertrand Russell's policy, is: People must be kept stupid.

And if you are going to keep them stupid, you can not maintain a population of 7 billion people. You have to reduce it to less than 2 billion. And what you have with Obama, with Obama's health-care policy, which is a copy of Hitler's health-care policy, a copy of Tony Blair's health-care policy, and then, imported into the United States, is, Nazism! Is, keep the people stupid. And keep the population size down to the level where people are stupid, work for dirt wages, and then the empire can persist.

Intelligent people, who are capable of understanding how a world system works, understand why we need nation-states, based on language groups. They must be eliminated, is what the intent is. So, all these other things, are not the intent of greed, money greed. Money greed is there, but money greed is not the motive for this thing, and people who try to explain this in terms of money greed, do not understand it.

Since the collapse of the Persian Empire, and since the Peloponnesian War, you had the rise of maritime imperialism, which was then centered in the Mediterranean, until 1492, when the break into the Atlantic region occurred. And you have in this process, a movement, over the period of religious warfare, from 1492 to 1648, you had a movement of the center of power, away from the Mediterranean Sea, into the maritime area of the Atlantic, and from the Atlantic, into the Pacific and Indian Oceans.

So, imperialism is that. Imperialism is not one nation trying to absorb other nations. Imperialism is an international system, on which a monetary system, runs the world. And manages the world in a way which keeps the population stupid enough, that you can not maintain today's level of population; you have got to back to less than 2 billion people. So, it's a policy of genocide. The green movement, so-called, the windmills, the solar panels, is a policy of genocide. It's a continuation of Hitler's movement. (cont. athttp://www.larouchepub.com/lar/2010/interviews/3733lpactv_obama_out... )


Amelia Gora

OBAMA IS MESSED UP!!!!.....................lol................evidence taken and documented...........

OOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMA!


*************************************************
Note:  OBAMA is a descendant of JOSEPH BOOTH.............
          Hawaiian Kingdom was returned to Queen Liliuokalani by President Cleveland......
therefore, OBAMA was born in a foreign country, the Hawaiian Kingdom.............or born in KENYA, AFRICA..............

sharing this cute video from youtube.com

Just for Laffs

 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dj0jo-XLzHQ



 Fail"">
0:39


******************************************************************...
Tags:
Share Twitter Facebook
▼ Reply to This






















 
 
Upload Files
Attach files (limit: 5MB)

Stop Following – Don't email me when people reply

Replies to This Discussion

Amelia GoraPermalink Reply by Amelia Gora on Sunday
Delete
 Find more artists like Hawaiian Nation at Myspace Music
Pilipo:

"We are being overrun, just like the Tsunami of Japan, by Ambercromie who came back to Hawaii to accomplish two things; deliver Hawaii stamped, "Paid In Full" and protect Obama's birth."

**************************
For the Records:

Kaukuna's photo---
HewaCapitol55

1.  Opposition is documented against the Abercrombie's 195, SB1520.

2. OBAMA's birth, social security, etc.

************************************************
Opposition Continues because

Something STINKS...............(.and I know it's NOT ME)  WICKED TO THE MAX!


aloha.
eyes 068
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGKx2LNbF5M

Sudden RushMessenjah's (Feat.Amy Hanaialii Gilom)

Sudden Rush- Messenjah's (Feat.Amy Hanaialii Gilom)
by sablancpm | 2 years ago | 4,201 views
PomaikaiokalaniPermalink Reply by Pomaikaiokalani on Sunday
EXPOSE Abercrombie and his native Hawaiian LuLu BELLS like KAOHI... 
Amelia GoraPermalink Reply by Amelia Gora on Sunday
Delete

Is Barack Obama Really a U.S. Citizen?

By Kimberly Powell, About.com Guide   August 30, 2008
Sponsored Links
US Marriage ImmigrationSpecializing in US Marriage Visas. AOS & marriage based Green Cards.www.1-800-usa-immigration.com
President Obama's WebsiteThis election is about our future. Help change the world again.www.BarackObama.com
Certificate CitizenshipPrepare your Form N-600 online. Certificate of Citizenship. Apply.www.Immigrationdirect.com/FormN-600
The ancestry of politicians always seems to interest people, but I don't think I've ever before seen the frenzy that's been brought about by the family tree of Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama over the past year. At least once a month, it seems, the blogosphere is abuzz with some new question regarding his ancestry. The big one this month? Is Barack Obama really a U.S. citizen and, therefore, eligible to run for President of the United States?
In answer to these questions, the Obama campaign released a Hawaii certificate of live birth for Barack Hussein Obama in June - first to The Daily Kos, a "progressive" blog, and next to their own Fight the Smears Web site. Of course, this was then followed up by a flurry of bloggers who found a multitude of reasons why this does not appear to be an authentic certificate of birth. Some even say that he was born in and his birth registered in Kenya. By Hawaii law, certificates of birth are available only to family members - so none of the naysayers are able to check the facts for themselves.

Under Sec. 301 (a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, the act in effect at the time of Barack Obama's birth, the following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
(7) "a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided that any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States by such citizen parent may be included in computing the physical presence requirements of this paragraph."
This proviso in this act does not apply to Barack Obama, because his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham Obama, was not yet 19 years of age at the time of his birth.
This brings us to the immigration law currently in effect under the U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act, U.S. Code, Title 8, Section 1401, Sec. 301 (g), as amended by the Immigration and Nationality Corrections Act (Public Law 103-416) on October 25, 1994:
"...a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years..."
Stanley Ann, the mother of Barack Obama, would qualify under current law - she was a citizen of the United States and age 18 at the time of his birth.
How does a law has only been in effect since 1987 apply to Barack Obama? Further down under Sec. 301 (g):
"This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date."
and from Sec. 301(h):
"a person born before noon (Eastern Standard Time) May 24, 1934, outside the limits and jurisdiction of the United States of an alien father and a mother who is a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, had resided in the United States."
This makes it sound as if Barack Obama is a U.S. citizen on the basis of his mother's citizenship at the time of his birth. Yet the above proviso is apparently intended to apply to persons born on or after May 24, 1934 and befo..., and does not appear to override the fact that the applicable law for transmitting citizenship to a child born abroad when one parent is a U.S. citizen is the statute that was in effect at the time of the child's birth.
Therefore, based on U.S. naturalization and citizenship law as I understand it (and I'm not a lawyer), it's apparently possible that Barack Obama would not be a citizen of the United States if he was not born in Hawaii, one of many claims made in a filed a lawsuit last week in U.S. District Court by Philip J. Berg, former member of Pennsylvania's Democratic State Committee and former attorney general of Pennsylvania, asking the court to declare Barack Obama ineligible for the presidency. Yet, Barack Obama was born in Hawaii according to his campaign, which makes the naturalization discussion moot. FactChecker.org says that it obtained and examined Obama's actual birth certificate and it was indeed real. FactChecker also reports that a researcher "looking to dig up dirt on Obama instead found a birth announcement for a son born to Mr. and Mrs. Barack H. Obama that had been published in the Honolulu Advertiser on Sunday, August 13, 1961.
Bottom line: Barack Obama is indeed a U.S. Citizen. He was born on U.S. soil, which by virtue of the 14th Amendment makes him a natural-born citizen.
Comments
August 30, 2008 at 11:38 am
(1) misstickly says :
Thanks for addressing this. God knows Barry Soetoro won’t address it.
August 30, 2008 at 2:44 pm
(2) Jean says :
All standard info. However, it doesn’t address the fact that 3 experts examined the birth certificate, and found it to be fraudulent, and also the possiblity that it is the birth certificate of Baracks half sister.
Also lacking is the fact that Barack was adopted by his step father, and renamed Barry Soeleto. In Indonesia. Since his return to the U.S. he has not resubmitted is allegiance.
Thirdly…there is also talk of his paternal grandmother and other family members, who claim to have been in attendance for Baracks birth…In Kenya.
August 30, 2008 at 2:51 pm
(3) Ann Onamus says :
Enough of this biased sensationalism!
Is John McCain Really a U.S. Citizen?
He was born in Panama . . .
August 30, 2008 at 3:20 pm
(4) Valerie says :
Um… what does this really have to do with Genealogy? Unless this is being followed up with a discussion on McCain’s citizenship, this smacks of partisan politics. Can we not go there please?

Sponsored Links
Find Birth Records Search1) Search Birth Records for Free 2) Find the Records Instantly!Birth.Archives.com
Search Genealogy Records:Newspaper archive 1690-today Millions of obituaries and more!www.GenealogyBank.com
August 30, 2008 at 5:15 pm
(5) Robert Lewis says :Obama’s mother’s original Social Security Number Application
webofdeception.com/obamamother’sssapplication.html
August 30, 2008 at 7:14 pm
(6) Kimberly says :I never intended for this to be political at all. Just a look at various U.S. naturalization laws and how complicated they can be – for both the presidential candidates…and our ancestors. But so noone considers me partisan, I’ve also added a discussion about the questions surrounding John McCain’s status as a “natural born” citizen.
September 8, 2008 at 3:45 pm
(7) tes says :To Jean, who said “However, it doesn’t address the fact that 3 experts examined the birth certificate, and found it to be fraudulent, and also the possiblity that it is the birth certificate of Baracks half sister.”
Actually,
1) WorldNetDaily (a republican-leaning/anti-Obama publication) has conducted its own investigation and determined (a) that the document is authentic; and (b) that at least some of the “so-called experts” who assert that the document is a forgery actually committed forgery themselves.
2) Factcheck.org also examined it, and found it authentic.
3) Politifact.com also examined it, and found it authentic AND obtained confirmation from the Hawaii Department of Health that it is authentic.
4) TexasDarlin – the blogger who first published information from the “experts” who allege forgery, also published the entry in the local newspaper, less than a week after Obama’s birth, showing that he was born in Hawaii.
See http://www.whatsyourevidence.com for citations to these sources.
September 8, 2008 at 3:52 pm
(8) tes says :To Jean, who said Also lacking is the fact that Barack was adopted by his step father, and renamed Barry Soeleto. In Indonesia. Since his return to the U.S. he has not resubmitted is allegiance.
This is not a “fact.” It is an allegation, for which NO evidence has been provided, except for the school registry. While that, arguably, could be one ‘piece’ of evidence, it is by no means conclusive. As reported by the AP at the time the photo was taken, it was common to list step-children under their father’s name, nationality, and religion in Indonesia at that time. Thus, that document proves nothing.
Moreover, a big legal question remains: Would a U.S. Court “recognize” an Indonesian law that operated to strip a U.S. Citizen of his|her citizenship as a child, when s|he had no say in the matter? I think not. It is HIGHLY unlikely that a U.S. Court would recognize any law that stripped a person of his|her US citizenship unless that person, as an adult, took proactive steps to relinquish such citizenship.
Thirdly…there is also talk of his paternal grandmother and other family members, who claim to have been in attendance for Baracks birth…In Kenya.
You may recall that there was (untrue and uncommonly vicious) talk that McCain had a black baby out of wedlock in the 200 South Carolina. All that talk didn’t make it any more true. In fact, it was demonstrably false.
October 5, 2008 at 12:37 am
(9) Interested Observer says :Actually, this is not his original 1961 Birth Certificate anyway, but a 2007 certificate issued by the state of Hawaii (assumed). Check the bottom–the form was made in 2001 and printed on a Laserjet… The original may have contained information somewhat different from this one. Also, even the original may have been arrived at in steps described in the lawsuit, were Barack Obama actually born in Kenya then flown to Hawaii. McCain is natural-born because both his parents were citizens; Obama’s were not. Then Obama was (likely) adopted by his step-dad in Indonesia, attended Islamic school where another document identifies (likely) that he was adopted, and (likely) has dual-citizenship. The President cannot have dual-citizenship. The birth announcement supposedly from the Honolulu Advertiser in 1961 may or may not be real (check the type font…). Also, I would think that the mother would have wanted to have an announcement of the birth–but it does not say he was born in Hawaii, notice. If I had a kid in another country the announcement would look the same.
So why is Obama not providing a copy of his original with his mom’s signature, to us, the American people, his employer? Also, any verification to show that he was NOT born in Kenya and later applied for a Hawaii birth certificate? Just put this to rest Obama, please so we can decide if you are eligible for us to hire you. Or, are you above submitting to the American people? Say it ain’t so, BHO.
October 7, 2008 at 11:17 pm
(10) Irene Bogue says :Sec. 301 (a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 does apply to Barack Obama. His mother was 17 yrs. old when he was born. She was not allowed to fly back to the US from Kenya due to her advanced pregnancy, and took Barry Obama to Hawaii after his birth where a birth certificate may or may not have been issued.
Because Barack’s mother was not physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than ten years, and at age 17 did not meet requirements that at least five of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years, Barack Obama is a Kenyan by birth. Not only that, but he travels on an Indonesian passport. His citizenship in Indonesia stems from his mother’s having renounced her US citizenship when she became a citizen of Indonesia, then married Soetoro and as a minor child Obama would fall under his mother’s citizenship. He is a dual citizen of Kenya and Indonesia. He is an illegal immigrant in the USA.
A certificated Certificate of Live Birth has not been produced by Barack Obama. If it were a certificated copy of the original birth certificate, it would most likely have been hand written by his mother or typed by hospital staff in 1961 while his mother was in the hospital, with an original signature by his mother and the official State of Hawaii seals on it.
Amelia GoraPermalink Reply by Amelia Gora on Sunday
Delete
October 18, 2008 at 10:08 am
(11) Bob Greene says :
Remarriage by Obama’s mother after Obama’s birth is irrelevant to Obama’s citizenship status. Under current US immigration law, a child born of a US citizen abroad retains US citizenship until he may decide to renounce it on or after reaching age 18.
The possibility Indonesia might regard child Obama as its citizen in no way qualifies Obama’s claims to US citizenship under US law.
The Constitution requires the president to be only a natural-born citizen. Dual citizenship is not specifically prohibited.
Dual-citizenship is also quite common in American power circles– Israeli-American dual citizenship is held by Paul Wolfowitz, John Bolton, Ari Fleischer, Eliott Abrams, Scooter Libby, Michael Mukasey, Richard Perle, to name only a few– all of whom hols, oe have held sensitive, powerful positions in the US government in the Bush term.
October 24, 2008 at 2:00 am
(12) Jason - in the service of God and Country says :
Just to clarify some items, here is the entire text from the INTCA (http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/86757.pdf) regarding persons born abroad. Again, if the Senator was indeed born overseas, the following pertains. Note the part that says “still is applicable”…
“7 FAM 1133.2-2 Original Provisions and Amendments to
Section 301
(CT:CON-204; 11-01-2007)
a. Section 301 as Effective on December 24, 1952: When enacted in 1952,
section 301 required a U.S. citizen married to an alien to have been
physically present in the United States for ten years, including five after
reaching the age of fourteen, to transmit citizenship to foreign-born
children. The ten-year transmission requirement remained in effect from
12:01 a.m. EDT December 24, 1952, through midnight November 13,
1986, and still is applicable to persons born during that period. As
originally enacted, section 301(a)(7) stated: Section 301. (a) The
following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth: (7)
a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its
outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a
citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was
physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a
period or periods totaling not less than ten years, at least five of which
were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any
periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States by
such citizen parent may be included in computing the physical presence
requirements of this paragraph.”
The previous section containing, 7 FAM 1133.2-1, 301(g) and 301(h), shows the US law as it exists now.
There is also a provision in the INTCA regarding the Panama Canal zone, for the one who asked earlier on in this thread, it’s worth reading.
November 3, 2008 at 3:16 am
(13) A Week In the Life of A Redhead says :
I am trying to read where it is said that this Berg lawsuit was thrown out of court… as it was.
November 6, 2008 at 9:23 am
(14) Robb says :
Good God.
Will you listen to yourselves? The next thing you are going to say is the man isn’t even from Earth. That he’s some sort of lizard man that unzips his human husk behind closed doors.
Bottom line.
The birth certificate is REAL. His passion for turning around this country is REAL. His commitment to change is REAL. The haters bigotry and inability for change is REAL.
Now that he is President Elect, give the guy a chance for Christ sakes before you crash and burn him.
Look on the bright side. Even if he was a lizard man, at least he isn’t a snake man like George W.
November 11, 2008 at 1:38 pm
(15) justanothercitizen says :
From section 1401 of the USC (g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 288 of title 22 by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person (A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or (B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 288 of title 22, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date;
Please note changes in time for “physical-presence” and the last paragraph of proviso.
Our president-elect is a U.S. citizen whether he was born in Hawaii or elsewhere to his U.S. citizen mother. As a matter of fact he is our #1 citizen! Now let’s get behind this man and come together as the citizens we should all be. Thank You
November 11, 2008 at 9:15 pm
(16) kmc says :
Hawaii was made the 50th state in 1959, so Obama’s birth in 1961, qualifies him to be eligible for President!
November 19, 2008 at 5:57 pm
(17) MrMax says :
To “Ann Onamus”
McCain was not born in Panama. He was born in the Canal Zone at a time when, by treaty with Panama, the Canal Zone was sovereign US territory, what the law calls “an outlying possession of the United States.” The provision of law applicable to McCain is 8 USC 1401(e), which confers natural born citizenship on “a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person.”
July 22, 2009 at 1:29 pm
(18) A. Singer says :
In 1961 Hawaii was a State. I was there (U.S. Army) when it became a state.
Even if neither parent had been a citizen, he, by virtue of being born within the U.S. was a citizen at the moment of his birth.
Anyone who disputes this obviously wasn’t paying attention in Civics classes (as the course was called when I was in school in the late ’40s).
Get over it! You and all the like nitwits look like you don’t deserve U.S. citizenship. It does require at least a bit more intellect than pond scum.
September 12, 2009 at 1:46 am
(19) Dan says :
Is Barack Obama really a U.S. citizen?
If he was born in Hawaii, on August 4, 1961, as stated on his Certification of Live Birth (not Certificate of Live Birth) then yes he would be. 8 U.S.C. 1405 states:
“A person born in Hawaii on or after April 30, 1900, is a citizen of the United States at birth.”
However, this does not mean that he is a natural born citizen, under Article II, Section 5, Clause 1 of the Constitution of the United States (of America). To learn more about who is a natural born citizen, go to this link http://www.australia.to/index.php?option=com_content&view=artic...
September 12, 2009 at 1:51 am
(20) Dan says :
Sorry, gave you the wrong link. The correct link is: http://www.australia.to/index.php?option=com_content&view=artic...
January 7, 2010 at 10:28 am
(21) Mike says :
Oboma is not a citizen. McCain is! Know the Laws!
September 2, 2010 at 10:28 am
(22) jennifer grampetro says :
so this is what people are saying is theres a chance hes from a diffrent country that the people are trying to kill us humm that makes me think is here really to help us servive or to kill us all i dont think anyone has the right to be president unless there family and they were born in america not adopted into america how we no if thats a set up to get all our info and then kill us all
September 2, 2010 at 10:31 am
(23) jennifer says :
sorry my daughter got on the computer to speak her mind please disregard anything said above
January 23, 2011 at 11:03 am
(24) Richard says :
Even if Obama’s mother went into labor while abroad, at most, she was only a few months shy of fulfilling the technical five year residency requirement under the 1952 McCarren and Walter Act. I highly doubt if any judge would rule Obama not a naturally born citizen just because his mother went into labor three months before her nineteenth birthday. If so, all pregnant 18 year old U.S. citizens, who were impregnated by aliens, would have needed to wait until they reached their 19th birthday before travelling overseas, just in case they might go into labor while in a foreign country. This would be absurd. Such a determination certainly wouldn’t be within the intent of the law at the time.
January 28, 2011 at 12:02 am
(25) Amy Willis says :
There can’t be a birth certificate listing obama sr as obama II’s father due to the adoption by soetoro…the document does not exist.
March 15, 2011 at 4:18 pm
(26) tfb says :
But the Supreme Court ruled no 14th amendment Citizen is eligible to be president because none are natural born citizens.
See 14th amendment citzens are those by statute, natural born citizens are those by nature (2 US Citizen parents born on US soil)
April 7, 2011 at 4:04 pm
(27) joan says :
Never in my life did I think we had such ignorant people in the United States . It appears that those who doubt our President’s birth state are twisting the story to fit their needs . I am sure that these same people would twist it the other way if it worked in their favor . Otherwise , the intregrity of those , and the reason behind their smearing our President , needs to be addressed . You know , at one time we were arch enemies of the Japanese people . Together we rebuilt their country . But the Japanese took it a bit further . Not only are they better educated but they seem to have greater dignity and respect for each other . They truly are the greater society . All nations have their problems . We surely dont need to add to the problems with name smearing and lies . Grow up and be part of a nation that needs to work on their manners .
July 11, 2011 at 12:31 am
(28) Mark Sullivan says :
No where in your article do you address the Full Faith and Credit Clause Art IV Sec I “Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State…” It doesn’t matter whether you “think” the B/C is a forgery, all states are Constitutionally bound to accept it as a true document. Your argument is a Reductio ad absurdum. Furthermore, Obama’s mother does meet the criteria of U.S. Code, Title 8, Section 1401, Sec. 301 (g) because of the retroactive application of the 1994 AMENDMENT, even if Obama was born in Kenya. You are left with only one argument as to qualifying under Art II Sec 2, a Natural Born Citizen. Art I Sec 8 allows congress…”To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization…” and that was done with the 14th Amendment Clause 1. How can you possibly come to the conclusion that Obama is “possibly” not qualified to be the President? Did you fail Con Law? Please Explain

http://genealogy.about.com/b/2008/08/30/is-barack-obama-really-a-us...
PomaikaiokalaniPermalink Reply by Pomaikaiokalani on Sunday
BUMP OUT Abercrombie and his LuLu BELLS like KAOHI.........................
Amelia GoraPermalink Reply by Amelia Gora on Sunday

I tried to enter the following at this website......couldn't due to limited characters........then the second version then the third version:

First Version:

Am still trying to make sense of the genealogies put out by a genealogy website......doubting that the U.S. can maintain claims to the Hawaiian Islands as a legal state due to Premeditation to take over the Hawaiian Islands in 1893 see http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F00617FD345B1A738... and Stephen Kinzer's book OVERTHROW, etc. .... finding the DUNHAM name turning up and married into the BOOTH family whose descendants include the BANK OF HAWAII owners, of which BARACK OBAMA'S grandmother was a CEO/Corporation Executive Officer......finding that our Hawaiian Trust - Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates/Kamehameha Schools has as one of the heirs named BERNICE PAUAHI DUNHAM............have information that KENYA is the area where OBAMA was actually born....and RECENT Info on his Social Security:


Social Security Number:

Subject: Fwd: SSN from Researcher Mike
To:



    Facts regarding a SSN.  Everyone's first three digits represent the
    state where the application was submitted.  Matter of fact known and used
    by the military and civil service personnel when doing background checks
    regarding  applications.

     
    THIS IS WAY MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE "BOGUS BIRTH CERTIFICATE"  THE
    MAN IS A COMPLETE FRAUD.  SPREAD THE WORD!!  AND GET OUT THE VOTE!!

    
    The Plot Thickens
    
    An intensive investigation has revealed the identity of the man whose Social
    Security number (SSN) is being used by President Obama:   Jean Paul Ludwig,
    who was born in France in 1890, emigrated to the United States in 1924, and
    was assigned SSN 042-68-4425 (Obama's current SSN) in or about March 1977.
    
    Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut..  Because of that, his
    SSN begins with the digits 042, which are among only a select few reserved
    for Connecticut residents.
    
    Obama never lived or worked in that state!  Therefore, there is no reason on
    earth for his SSN to start with the digits 042.  None whatsoever!
    
    Now comes the best part!  Ludwig spent the final months of his life in
    Hawaii, where he died.
    
    Conveniently, Obama's grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, worked part-time in
    the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse, and therefore had
    access to the SSNs of deceased individuals.
    
    The Social Security Administration was never informed of Ludwig'sdeath, and
    because he never received Social Security benefits there were no benefits to
    stop and therefore, no questions were ever raised.
    
    The suspicion, of course, is that Dunham, knowing her grandson was not a
    U.S. citizen, either because he was born in Kenya or became a citizen of
    Indonesia upon his adoption by Lolo Soetoro simply scoured the probate
    records until she found someone who died who was not receiving Social
    Security benefits, and selected Mr. Ludwig's Connecticut SSN for Obama.
    
    Just wait until Trump gets past the birth certificate and onto the issue
    of Barry O's use of a stolen SSN. You will see leftist heads exploding,
    because they will have no way of defending Obama.
    
    Although many Americans do not understand the meaning of the term "natural
    born" there are few who do not understand that if you are using someone
    else's SSN it is a clear indication of fraud.
    
    Let's all start getting the word out to everybody on our mailing lists.

********************************************************  Maybe everyone can help to iron out the facts too......the truth is the truth is the truth is the truth.........

aloha.

*************************
Second Version:

Am still trying to make sense of the genealogies put out by a genealogy website......doubting that the U.S. can maintain claims to the Hawaiian Islands as a legal state due to Premeditation to take over the Hawaiian Islands in 1893 see http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F00617FD345B1A738... and Stephen Kinzer's book OVERTHROW, etc. .... finding the DUNHAM name turning up and married into the BOOTH family whose descendants include the BANK OF HAWAII owners, of which BARACK OBAMA'S grandmother was a CEO/Corporation Executive Officer......finding that our Hawaiian Trust - Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates/Kamehameha Schools has as one of the heirs named BERNICE PAUAHI DUNHAM............have information that KENYA is the area where OBAMA was actually born....and RECENT Info on his Social Security:



    An intensive investigation has revealed the identity of the man whose Social
    Security number (SSN) is being used by President Obama:   Jean Paul Ludwig,
    who was born in France in 1890, emigrated to the United States in 1924, and
    was assigned SSN 042-68-4425 (Obama's current SSN) in or about March 1977.
    
    Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut..  Because of that, his
    SSN begins with the digits 042, which are among only a select few reserved
    for Connecticut residents.
    
    Obama never lived or worked in that state!  Therefore, there is no reason on
    earth for his SSN to start with the digits 042.  None whatsoever!
    
    Now comes the best part!  Ludwig spent the final months of his life in
    Hawaii, where he died.
    
    Conveniently, Obama's grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, worked part-time in
    the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse, and therefore had
    access to the SSNs of deceased individuals. Read more at the link...
   Maybe everyone can help to iron out the facts too......the truth is the truth is the truth is the truth.........

aloha.

*************************
Third Version:
OBAMA's genealogies are questionnable......doubting that the U.S. can maintain claims to the Hawaiian Islands as a legal state due to Premeditation to take over the Hawaiian Islands in 1893 see http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F00617FD345B1A738... and Stephen Kinzer's book OVERTHROW, etc. .... finding the DUNHAM name part of the BOOTH family whose descendants include the BANK OF HAWAII owners, of which BARACK OBAMA'S grandmother was a CEO/Corporation Executive Officer, descendant/heir in our Hawaiian Trust - Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estates....and RECENT Info shows FRAUD on his Social Security!


 ***********************
The Comment still didn't show.......which means OBAMA's people must surely be filtering the information.........and even here on MAOLIWORLD because his KENYA birth certificate, complete with baby prints has disappeared off of this thread..............hmmm.........

 Find more artists like Hawaiian Nation at Myspace Music

For the Records:

Kaukuna's photo---
HewaCapitol55

1.  Opposition is documented against the Abercrombie's 195, SB1520.

2. OBAMA's birth, social security, etc.

************************************************
Opposition Continues because

Something STINKS...............(.and I know it's NOT ME)  WICKED TO THE MAX!


aloha.
eyes 068
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGKx2LNbF5M

Sudden RushMessenjah's (Feat.Amy Hanaialii Gilom)

Sudden Rush- Messenjah's (Feat.Amy Hanaialii Gilom)
by sablancpm | 2 years ago | 4,201 views
Amelia GoraPermalink Reply by Amelia Gora on Sunday
Delete
COMPLAIN, SUBMIT QUESTIONS TO SOCIAL SECURITY ABOUT OBAMA!

Identity Theft And Your Social Security Number

SSA Publication No. 05-10064, August 2009, ICN 463270 [View .pdf]  Get Accessible Adobe Acrobat Reader (Español)[Audio.mp3audio icon

 

Identity theft is one of the fastest growing crimes in America. A dishonest person who has your Social Security number can use it to get other personal information about you. Identity thieves can use your number and your good credit to apply for more credit in your name. Then, they use the credit cards and do not pay the bills. You may not find out that someone is using your number until you are turned down for credit or you begin to get calls from unknown creditors demanding payment for items you never bought.
Someone illegally using your Social Security number and assuming your identity can cause a lot of problems.

Contents



Your number is confidential   Skip list of links
How might someone steal your number?
Be careful with your Social Security card and number
What if you think someone is using your number?
What if an identity thief is creating credit problems for me?
Should you get a new Social Security number?
Contacting Social Security
 

 

Your number is confidential

The Social Security Administration protects your Social Security number and keeps your records confidential. We do not give your number to anyone, except when authorized by law. You should be careful about sharing your number, even when you are asked for it. You should ask why your number is needed, how it will be used and what will happen if you refuse. The answers to these questions can help you decide if you want to give out your Social Security number.
 

 

How might someone steal your number?

Identity thieves get your personal information by:
  • Stealing wallets, purses and your mail (bank and credit card statements, pre-approved credit offers, new checks and tax information);
  • Stealing personal information you provide to an unsecured site on the Internet, from business or personnel records at work and personal infor­mation in your home;
  • Rummaging through your trash, the trash of businesses and public trash dumps for personal data;
  • Posing by phone or E-mail as someone who legitimately needs information about you, such as employers or landlords; or
  • Buying personal information from “inside” sources. For example, an identity thief may pay a store employee for information about you that appears on an application for goods, services or credit.
 

 

Be careful with your Social Security card and number

Show your card to your employer when you start a job so your records are correct. Provide your Social Security number to your financial institution(s) for tax reporting purposes. Keep your card and any other document that shows your Social Security number on it in a safe place. DO NOT routinely carry your card or other documents that display your number.
 
 

What if you think someone is using your number?

Sometimes more than one person uses the same Social Security number, either on purpose or by accident. If you suspect  someone else is using your number for work purposes, you should contact us to report the problem. We will review your earnings with you to ensure our records are correct.
You also may review earnings posted to your record on your Social Security Statement(Form SSA-7005). The Statement is mailed automatically each year to workers age 25 and older. You also can get a Statement at any time by requesting one online or by calling our 800 number.
 

 

What if an identity thief is creating credit problems for you?

If someone has misused your Social Security number or other personal information to create credit or other problems for you, Social Security cannot resolve these problems. But there are several things you should do.
You should contact the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) at www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/microsites/idtheft. Or, you can call 1-877-IDTHEFT (1-877-438-4338); TTY 1-866-653-4261. The FTC website is a one-stop national resource to learn about the crime of identity theft. It provides detailed information to help you deter, detect and defend against identity theft.
You also may want to contact the Internal Revenue Service. An identity thief might also use your Social Security number to file a tax return in order to receive a refund. If the thief files the tax return before you do, the IRS will believe you already filed and received your refund if eligible. If your Social Security number is stolen, another individual may use it to get a job. That person’s employer would report income earned to the IRS using your Social Security number, making it appear that you did not report all of your income on your tax return. If you think you may have tax issues because someone has stolen your identity, contact the IRS Identity Protection Unit at www.irs.gov/privacy/article/0,,id=186436,00.html or call 1-800-908-4490.
Also, you should file an online complaint with the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) at www.ic3.gov.
The IC3 gives victims of cyber crime a convenient and easy-to-use reporting mechanism that alerts authorities of suspected criminal or civil violations. IC3 sends every complaint to one or more law enforcement or regulatory agencies that have jurisdiction over the matter.
IC3’s mission is to receive, develop and refer criminal complaints regarding the rapidly expanding arena of cyber crime. For law enforcement and regulatory agencies at the federal, state, local and international level, IC3 provides a central referral mechanism for complaints involving Internet related crimes.
The IC3 reflects a partnership between the Federal Bureau of Investigationthe National White Collar Crime Center and the Bureau of Justice Assistance.
You also should monitor your credit report periodically. Free credit reports are available online at www.annualcreditreport.com.

 

 

Should you get a new Social Security number?

If you have done all you can to fix the problems resulting from misuse of your Social Security number and someone still is using your number, we may assign you a new number.
You cannot get a new Social Security number:
  • To avoid the consequences of filing for bankruptcy;
  • If you intend to avoid the law or your legal responsibility; or
  • If your Social Security card is lost or stolen, but there is no evidence that someone is using your number.
If you decide to apply for a new num­ber, you will need to prove your age, U.S. citizenship or lawful immigration status and identity. For more information, ask for Your Social Security Number And Card (Publication Number 05-10002). You also will need to provide evidence that you still are being disadvantaged by the misuse.
Keep in mind that a new number probably will not solve all your problems. This is because other governmental agencies (such as the Internal Revenue Service and state motor vehicle agencies) and private businesses (such as banks and credit reporting companies) likely will have records under your old number. Also, because credit reporting companies use the number, along with other personal information, to identify your credit record, using a new number will not guarantee you a fresh start. This is especially true if your other personal information, such as your name and address, remains the same.
If you receive a new Social Security number, you will not be able use the old number anymore.
For some victims of identity theft, a new number actually creates new problems. If the old credit information is not associated with the new number, the absence of any credit history under the new number may make it more difficult for you to get credit.

 

 

Contacting Social Security

Our website is a valuable resource for information about all of Social Security’s programs. There are a number of things you can do online.
In addition to using our website, you can call us toll-free at 1-800-772-1213. We treat all calls confidentially. We can answer specific questions from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., Monday through Friday. We can provide information by automated phone service 24 hours a day. (You can use our automated response system to tell us a new address or request a replacement Medicare card.) If you are deaf or hard of hearing, you may call our TTY number, 1-800-325-0778.
We also want to make sure you receive accurate and courteous service. That is why we have a second Social Security representative monitor some telephone calls.
Amelia GoraPermalink Reply by Amelia Gora yesterday
Delete
Posted the thread's information and the following are part of the responses, etc.:


Tweet: EXPOSING BARACK OBAMA, The Coconut (Brown on the Outside, White on the Inside): http://bit.ly/oiCg63
The man has a FRAUD Social Security number--his grandmother worked part time in the Courts, which means he was born in a foreign country.
by Amelia Gora (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 18 diaries, 19 comments [3 recommended]) on Sunday, Jul 17, 2011 at 1:45:04 PM
Recommend       (0+)
Reply To This


*******************************


  
Pirates Around Us in the Hawaiian Islands.....documented....
1.  Hawaii 2.  Cuba 3. Nicaragua 4.  Puerto Rico 5.  Philippines 6.  Guatemala 7.  Honduras 8.  Vietnam 9.  Chile 10.  Iran 11.  Grenada 12.  Panama 13.  Afghanistan 14.  IraqTargets documented in Stephen Kinzer's book OVERTHROW

have yet to check on the other nations ---open for all researchers, and be aware of the following:

HISTORICAL EVIDENCE OF WHY THE U.S. IS A PREDATORY NATION
WITH THE BANKERS, AMERICAN BUSINESSMEN, ETALS.

----Issues Affecting the Kingdom of Hawaii thru Iraq---
by Amelia Kuulei Gora (2003)  read more at click here=2011971%3ATopic%3A335481&page=3#comments  btw Royal persons are not subject to the laws  Pearl Harbor deed is based on FRAUD documented.........empower yourself with knowledge! truth, or perhaps the dreaded truth!   aloha.   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3A19q7rysLs&feature=related  p.s.  Joseph Booth, ancestor of the Dunham family was a saloon owner, a black hater and called some of our families the "N" word documented......Wicked.....in fact he called a very important Chief "a sh_t eating N-gger!" documented......fyi....so, he's an heir of GEORGE WASHINGTON who had shares in the BANK OF ENGLAND thru his ancestor ROBERT E. LEE, a CONFEDERATE/SOUTHERN GENERAL, a SLAVE KEEPER, with bloodlines of the blacks who CAPTURED their OWN People and SOLD THEM INTO SLAVERY, descendant of a drunkard SALOON Owner whose descendants started up the BANK OF HAWAII, etc.......thanks for looking this way because the truth must go out!
by Amelia Gora (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 18 diaries, 19 comments [3 recommended]) on Monday, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:28:27 AM
  

***************
hope and change
What we have here is.....hope and change.

Just think how hard it would have been to get this article published on OEN just a few short years ago, and now here it is.

This is a grand moment. A glorious moment of hope and change.

We should be sure to remember this moment while sitting behind razor-wire enclosures, waiting for the dawn to signal a new round of the executions....
by Ned Lud (14 fans, 0 articles, 102 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 2019 comments [1433 recommended]) on Sunday, Jul 17, 2011 at 7:23:46 PM


********************************

PomaikaiokalaniPermalink Reply by Pomaikaiokalani yesterday
There's NO Greater Enemy to our people at this time then Abercrombie and his native Hawaiian LuLu BELLS!
Hawaii is being SOLD OFF like a WHORE by Abercrombie and his LuLu BELLS!
As long as native Hawaiians like KAOHI has her PIECE of the Aina, KAOHI will go along with Abercrombie and his native Hawaiian LuLu BELL SELL OUTS!


Amelia GoraPermalink Reply by Amelia Gora yesterday

Honolulu Police Department:

A anonymous researcher has found some important info about U.S. President Barack Obama.  The issue of his stolen SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER is now reported by Amelia Gora.

message sent thru MAOLIWORLD.NING.COM at 1:00 PM today July 18, 2011 by Amelia Gora, Acting Liaison of Foreign Affairs, Royal Families House of Nobles, Ko Hawaii Pae Aina/Hawaiian Kingdom

aloha.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGKx2LNbF5M



p.s. message posted to interested others.
Amelia GoraPermalink Reply by Amelia Gora yesterday
Delete
for everyone's info...........the following was found on the English forums:

Americans should form private groups to produc e their own Internet security. as they can't depend on the gov't. for this.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/30/opinion/30thu1.html?_r=1&page...
NY Times
The Cloud Darkens
The Internet is getting scary. In recent weeks, hackers known as Lulz Security attacked the Web sites of Sony, the United States Senate, the C.I.A., PBS, among others. They stole names, e-mail addresses and passwords of millions of users and published them online. Then, last weekend, they regrouped under a new name.
These attacks are among the hundreds of online security breaches this year alone, compromising data of more than 22 million people, according to the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse. Targets have included Citigroup, Lockheed Martin and even RSA Security, which makes password tokens that big companies use to protect themselves from intrusion. A survey earlier this month by the Ponemon Institute found that 9 out of 10 companies had suffered an online attack in the last 12 months.
Companies and the government are unprepared. Citigroup didn’t track patterns of activity on its credit card site and failed to notice immediately when hackers took data on more than two million card users, said Avivah Litan, a security expert of Gartner. Sony didn’t encrypt the data of users of its PlayStation network — phone numbers, passwords, e-mail addresses and account histories.
Recently, for several hours, Dropbox, a popular service for storing documents and other files in the so-called computing cloud, allowed anyone to log into any of its 25 million user accounts using any password. The company tried to keep the glitch quiet but was exposed by a security researcher. No wonder concern about Internet security from Americans has jumped sharply in the past few months. Technology professionals are getting cold feet about moving more operations onto the cloud when poor corporate security practices are exposing customers to devastating identity theft and fraud. This vulnerability could stymie the Internet economy.
There is no fail-safe technology that is immune to hacking. Online security will evolve as hackers and security experts work continuously to outwit each other. Still, current standards are too low. Companies — and the government — must devote substantially more resources to security, making it integral to every new application, rather than patching it on as an afterthought.
There are some signs of progress. Security experts are deploying a new worldwide system to identify Internet addresses that will make it very difficult to forge or spoof a Web site. In May, the Obama administration proposed legislation with sensible provisions to ensure that companies running critical infrastructure — like the nation’s power grid — have adequate systems to reduce the risk of an attack online.
The proposal would standardize 47 state laws on breach reporting, requiring notification of customers whose accounts were compromised. This could be a powerful incentive for firms to take security more seriously.
Other tactics are also needed. The Federal Trade Commission wants rules to force companies to minimize the information they collect from customers and to dispose of such data as soon as possible. The stolen Sony data, for example, had been on dormant servers for years.
We are putting our lives in the cloud, as companies and consumers store everything from family photos to corporate business secrets on remote servers. Beefing up online security is of paramount importance.
Amelia GoraPermalink Reply by Amelia Gora just now
Delete
Appears to be what OBAMA, et. als. defends which is NOT in support of the U.S. Constitution, etc.:

http://www.wanttoknow.info/051115secretsocietiesbilderberg
Bilderberg Group
BBC Reports on Secretive Bilderbergers

The Bilderberg group, an elite coterie of Western thinkers and power-brokers, has been accused of fixing the fate of the world behind closed doors. Not a word of what is said at Bilderberg meetings can be breathed outside. Meetings often feature future political leaders shortly before they become household names. Bill Clinton went in 1991 while still governor of Arkansas, Tony Blair was there two years later while still an opposition MP. Private networks like Bilderberg have helped to oil the wheels of global politics and globalisation for the past half a century."
  -- BBC News (from two Bilderberg articles on BBC website dated 9/29/05 and 6/3/04 - links provided below)

Dear friends,
As one who has served as a language interpreter for Presidents George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and leaders of several other nations, I once scoffed at the notion that global politics was largely shaped by secret societies of the global elite. I had participated in a number of secret meetings myself and had seen no signs of influence by any secret societies. This all changed in July 2001 when a close friend sent me an eye-opening video which in two hours managed to convince me that the world was not what I had once thought. Since that fateful day four years ago, I have devoted myself full time to learning about the hidden forces that shape our world and to inspiring others to join in working for a brighter future.
The below excerpts from two BBC News articles reveal that there are secret societies of a global elite of which very few are aware. I invite you to inform yourself by reading these articles about the Bilderberg group, and then to explore the resources listed below the articles both to learn more about secret societies and for ideas on what you can do about it. This information may at first be disturbing, yet I invite you to see this as a powerful opportunity for all of us to bring these secret societies into public awareness and to work together for the good of all who share our world.
With best wishes,
Fred Burks for the WantToKnow.info Team
Former language interpreter for Presidents Bush and Clinton
Inside the secretive Bilderberg Group
How much influence do private networks of the rich and powerful have on government policies and international relations? One group, the Bilderberg, has often attracted speculation that it forms a shadowy global government.
The chairman of the secretive - he prefers the word private - Bilderberg Group is 73-year-old Viscount Etienne Davignon, corporate director and former European Commissioner. In his office, on a private floor above the Brussels office of the Suez conglomerate lined with political cartoons of himself, he told me what he thought of allegations that Bilderberg is a global conspiracy secretly ruling the world. "It is unavoidable and it doesn't matter," he says. "There will always be people who believe in conspiracies but things happen in a much more incoherent fashion."
Lack of publicity
In an extremely rare interview, he played down the importance of Bilderberg in setting the international agenda. "What can come out of our meetings is that it is wrong not to try to deal with a problem. But a real consensus, an action plan containing points 1, 2 and 3? The answer is no. People are much too sensible to believe they can do that."
Every year since 1954, a small network of rich and powerful people have held a discussion meeting about the state of the trans-Atlantic alliance and the problems facing Europe and the US. Organised by a steering committee of two people from each of about 18 countries, the Bilderberg Group (named after the Dutch hotel in which it held its first meeting) brings together about 120 leading business people and politicians.
At this year's meeting in Germany, the audience included the heads of the World Bank and European Central Bank, Chairmen or Chief Executives from Nokia, BP, Unilever, DaimlerChrysler and Pepsi - among other multi-national corporations, editors from five major newspapers, members of parliament, ministers, European commissioners, the crown prince of Belgium and the queen of the Netherlands.
"I don't think (we are) a global ruling class because I don't think a global ruling class exists. I simply think it's people who have influence interested to speak to other people who have influence," Viscount Davignon says. "Bilderberg does not try to reach conclusions - it does not try to say 'what we should do'. Everyone goes away with their own feeling and that allows the debate to be completely open, quite frank - and to see what the differences are. "Business influences society and politics influences society - that's purely common sense. It's not that business contests the right of democratically-elected leaders to lead".
For Bilderberg's critics the fact that there is almost no publicity about the annual meetings is proof that they are up to no good. Jim Tucker, editor of a right-wing newspaper, the American Free Press for example, alleges they organise wars and elect and depose political leaders. He describes the group as simply 'evil'. So where does the truth lie?
Professor Kees van der Pijl of Sussex University in Britain says such private networks of corporate and political leaders play an informal but crucial role in the modern world. "There need to be places where these people can think about the main challenges ahead, co-ordinate where policies should be going, and find out where there could be a consensus."
'Common sense'
Will Hutton, an economic analyst and former newspaper editor who attended a Bilderberg meeting in 1997, says people take part in these networks in order to influence the way the world works, to create what he calls "the international common sense" about policy. "On every issue that might influence your business you will hear at first-hand the people who are actually making those decisions and you will play a part in helping them to make those decisions and formulating the common sense," he says.
And that "common sense" is one which supports the interests of Bilderberg's main participants - in particular free trade. Viscount Davignon says that at the annual meetings, "automatically around the table you have internationalists" - people who support the work of the World Trade Organisation, trans-Atlantic co-operation and European integration.
Bilderberg meetings often feature future political leaders shortly before they become household names. Bill Clinton went in 1991 while still governor of Arkansas, Tony Blair was there two years later while still an opposition MP. All the recent presidents of the European Commission attended Bilderberg meetings before they were appointed.
'Secret Government'
This has led to accusations that the group pushes its favoured politicians into high office. But Viscount Davignon says his steering committee are simply excellent talent spotters. The steering committee "does its best assessment of who are the bright new boys or girls in the beginning phase of their career who would like to get known. It's not a total accident, but it's not a forecast and if they go places it's not because of Bilderberg, it's because of themselves," Viscount Davignon says.
But its critics say Bilderberg's selection process gives an extra boost to aspiring politicians whose views are friendly to big business. None of this, however, is easy to prove - or disprove. Observers like Will Hutton argue that such private networks have both good and bad sides. They are unaccountable to voters but, at the same time, they do keep the international system functioning. And there are limits to their power - a point which Bilderberg chairman was keen to stress, "When people say this is a secret government of the world, I say that if we were a secret government of the world we should be bloody ashamed of ourselves."
Informal and private networks like Bilderberg have helped to oil the wheels of global politics and globalisation for the past half a century. In the eyes of critics they have undermined democracy, but their supporters believe they are crucial to modern democracy's success. And so long as business and politics remain mutually dependent, they will continue to thrive.
Bilderberg: The ultimate conspiracy theory
The Bilderberg group, an elite coterie of Western thinkers and power-brokers, has been accused of fixing the fate of the world behind closed doors. As the organisation marks its 50th anniversary, rumours are more rife than ever.
Given its reputation as perhaps the most powerful organisation in the world, the Bilderberg group doesn't go a bundle on its switchboard operations. Telephone inquiries are met with an impersonal female voice...reciting back the number and inviting callers to "leave a message after the tone". Anyone who accidentally dialled the number would probably think they had stumbled on just another residential answer machine. But behind this ultra-modest façade lies one of the most controversial and hotly-debated alliances of our times.
On Thursday the Bilderberg group marks its 50th anniversary with the start of its yearly meeting. For four days some of the West's chief political movers, business leaders, bankers, industrialists and strategic thinkers will hunker down in a five-star hotel in northern Italy to talk about global issues.
What sets Bilderberg apart from other high-powered get-togethers, such as the annual World Economic Forum (WEF), is its mystique. Not a word of what is said at Bilderberg meetings can be breathed outside. No reporters are invited in and while confidential minutes of meetings are taken, names are not noted.
The shadowy aura extends further - the anonymous answerphone message, for example; the fact that conference venues are kept secret. The group, which includes luminaries such as Henry Kissinger and former UK chancellor Kenneth Clarke, does not even have a website. In the void created by such aloofness, an extraordinary conspiracy theory has grown up around the group that alleges the fate of the world is largely decided by Bilderberg.
In Yugoslavia, leading Serbs have blamed Bilderberg for triggering the war which led to the downfall of Slobodan Milosevic. The Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh, the London nail-bomber David Copeland and Osama Bin Laden are all said to have bought into the theory that Bilderberg pulls the strings with which national governments dance. And while hardline right-wingers and libertarians accuse Bilderberg of being a liberal Zionist plot, leftists such as activist Tony Gosling are equally critical. A former journalist, Mr Gosling runs a campaign against the group from his home in Bristol, UK.
"My main problem is the secrecy. When so many people with so much power get together in one place I think we are owed an explanation of what is going on. Mr Gosling seizes on a quote from Will Hutton, the British economist and a former Bilderberg delegate, who likened it to the annual WEF gathering where "the consensus established is the backdrop against which policy is made worldwide".
"One of the first places I heard about the determination of US forces to attack Iraq was from leaks that came out of the 2002 Bilderberg meeting," says Mr Gosling.

Comments and Resources for More Information
Why is this meeting of top leaders of our world kept so secret? Why is there no website? Why, until a few years ago, was there virtually no reporting on the influential Bilderberg Group at all in the major media? (Note that the alternative media has had some good articles and a Google search can be highly informative) If the Bilderbergers truly are supporting the interests of all of us, why the need for so much secrecy? I invite you to ask the hard questions and decide for yourself if you are interested in helping to build a better world.
Reliable information on secret societies such as the Bilderberg Group is often most difficult to find. I am most thankful to BBC News for publishing the two revealing articles above. More excellent media articles came out for the 2006 Bilderberg Group meeting in Ontario. CBS News thankfully also has a great article on the powerful Skull and Bones secret society, of which George W. Bush, his father, and John Kerry were all members. To read summaries of numerous key, yet little-known articles on secret societies in the major media (links to originals provided), click here. And the History Channel has made two excellent documentaries exposing secret societies at this link.
In my four years of research, I have been privileged to become part of a wonderful network of courageous people from around the globe who are working to provide reliable, verifiable information on what is happening behind the scenes for all who want to know. I invite you to explore our highly informative websitehttp://www.WantToKnow.info which specializes in fact-filled news articles and summaries of little-known, yet major cover-ups which impact our lives and our world. All information is taken from the most reliable sources available and can be verified with a little research.
Remember that this information can be quite overwhelming if you are new to this. Take your time, and consider interspersing your reading with some of theinspirational pieces on our website which help to inspire and empower us to build a brighter future for us all.
You can help to make a difference right now by sending this message to your friends and colleagues. By using email and the Internet to spread this knowledge around the globe, you can play a vital role in building the critical mass necessary to bring about positive, empowering changes in our lives and in our world. The more we share this information with others, the more chance there is of transforming our world into a safer, healthier place to live.
Take care and have a great day,
Fred Burks for the WantToKnow.info Team

Final Note:
 WantToKnow.info believes it is important to balance disturbing cover-up information with inspirational writings which call us to be all that we can be and to work together for positive change. Please visit our Inspiration Center at http://www.WantToKnow.info/inspirational for an abundance of uplifting material.

See our archive of revealing news articles at www.WantToKnow.info/indexnewsarticles

Your tax-deductible donations, however large or small, help greatly to support this important work.
To make a donation by credit card, check, or money order: www.WantToKnow.info/donationswtk

Explore the mind and heart expanding websites managed by the nonprofit PEERS network:

www.peerservice.org - PEERS websites: Spreading inspiration, education, & empowerment
www.momentoflove.org - Every person in the world has a heart
www.personalgrowthcourses.net - Dynamic online courses powerfully expand your horizons
www.WantToKnow.info - Reliable, verifiable information on major cover-ups
www.weboflove.org - Strengthening the Web of Love that interconnects us all

  includes the World Bank --- Remember that OBAMA is part of the heirs of the BANK OF ENGLAND thru his ancestor Robert E. Lee, Confederate General/black hater who was one of the heirs of GEORGE WASHINGTON and Wife MARTHA who had shares in the BANK OF ENGLAND, etc.
 Cancel

  •  
Amelia GoraPermalink Reply by Amelia Gora 1 second ag
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5FScZ424dI&NR=1

  glad INFOWARS are EXPOSING OBAMA, et. als. too!